AI-enabled risk based monitoring – Cardiac Safety
Ensuring the quality and integrity of ECG data is critical to evaluating cardiac safety throughout clinical development
Written by:
- Vickas Patel, M.D., Ph.D. – Chief Science and Regulatory Advisor, Cardiac Safety at Clario, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific
- Alain Gay, M.D. – VP, Scientific and Medical Affairs, Cardiac Solutions at Clario, part of Thermo Fisher Scientific
Summary
Artificial intelligence can be used to enhance risk-based monitoring by identifying ECG data inconsistencies, detecting potential patient misidentification and duplicate records, and improving overall data quality. By combining AI-powered analytics with expert clinical review, sponsors can proactively address data quality issues, reduce risk, and generate more reliable cardiac safety data to support regulatory submissions and confident development decisions.
Why high-quality ECG data is essential
High-quality ECG data is essential for accurately evaluating cardiac safety throughout drug development, particularly when assessing risks such as QT interval prolongation, arrhythmias, and other cardiac effects that could impact patient safety or regulatory approval. AI-enabled risk-based monitoring can help sponsors improve ECG data integrity by identifying potential data inconsistencies that might otherwise go undetected.
By analyzing each patient’s unique ECG “fingerprint,” artificial intelligence can detect potential duplicate recordings, patient misidentification, mislabeled ECGs, and unusual longitudinal changes in ECG patterns. These signals can then be reviewed by cardiac safety experts, enabling targeted site retraining, process improvements, and corrective actions that strengthen overall study quality and reliability.
What is the benefit of AI
AI can enhance risk-based monitoring strategies by providing continuous oversight of ECG data quality throughout a study. Rather than relying solely on traditional retrospective review processes, sponsors can use AI-driven analysis to help identify data quality concerns, reduce errors, and improve patient safety while maintaining regulatory compliance. This approach supports more efficient trial execution by helping clinical teams focus their efforts on the sites, subjects, and datasets that may require intervention, ultimately contributing to more accurate cardiac safety assessments and stronger clinical evidence.
By identifying poor-quality recordings early, sponsors gain actionable insights that allow them to implement corrective measures before quality issues affect later dose cohorts or critical cardiac analyses. Proactive quality assurance approaches help preserve valuable ECG data, reduces the risk of missing or unusable recordings, and increases confidence in future QT and proarrhythmic risk assessments. The result is a smarter, more efficient cardiac safety monitoring strategy that combines advanced analytics with expert clinical review to improve data quality, accelerate decision-making, and support successful drug development programs.
Why it matters
01
Identify ECG data problems early
AI-enabled monitoring can flag potential mislabeled ECGs, patient duplication, and unexpected longitudinal changes, helping protect data integrity and patient safety.
02
Enable earlier proactive intervention
Assessing ECG quality during study conduct can uncover issues early enough for corrective actions, such as site retraining or device replacement, before subsequent dosing cohorts.
03
Increase confidence in cardiac safety decisions
Combining AI-driven quality checks with expert review can produce more reliable cardiac safety data and reduce the risk that missing, incomplete, or inconsistent data obscure the true safety profile of an investigational therapy.
Explore the full white paper
Get the complete white paper today or click get started to continue the conversation.
FAQs
How can AI-enabled monitoring reduce risk in a clinical trial?
It can help sponsors proactively identify ECG quality concerns, reduce errors, and focus attention on the sites, subjects, and datasets that may require intervention.
Can AI detect potential patient identification errors?
Yes. By analyzing each patient’s unique ECG “fingerprint,” AI can flag possible patient misidentification, duplicate recordings, and mislabeled ECGs for expert review.
What actions can sponsors take after an issue is identified?
Findings can support targeted site retraining, process improvements, and corrective actions designed to strengthen study quality and reliability.
How does this approach support regulatory submissions?
Combining AI-powered analytics with expert clinical review can improve the quality and reliability of cardiac safety data used to support regulatory submissions and development decisions.
What is the overall benefit for cardiac safety programs?
The approach combines advanced analytics and clinical expertise to improve ECG data quality, strengthen cardiac safety assessments, and increase confidence in QT and proarrhythmic risk evaluations.